Business & Tech
Uber Loses Arbitration Bid, Must Fight Drivers in Court
A San Francisco judge ruled the ride-sharing company's contract with drivers contradicts itself making its arbitration clause unenforceable.

A San Francisco judge ruled Monday that Uber’s contract with its drivers forcing them into arbitration is unenforceable, Bloomberg Business reported.
San Francisco Superior Court Judge Ernest Goldsmith said that contract is “flatly inconsistent” because one provision said dispute should be resolved by arbitrator and another said it must be resolved by a judge.
“I’m not going to fly in the face of a stark inconsistency in order to massage this into arbitrability,” he said.
Find out what's happening in Elk Grovefor free with the latest updates from Patch.
The decision could have a major affect on Uber’s business model.
The San Francisco-based ride-sharing app company plans to appeal the ruling.
Find out what's happening in Elk Grovefor free with the latest updates from Patch.
Uber is being a sued by a driver, claiming she is entitled to be treated as an employee to recover lost wages and expenses reimbursement.
The California Labor Commission agree with the driver back in June and Uber is appealing that decision. The company argued its drivers are independent contractors and signed a contract agreeing to arbitration.
For more on this story, visit Bloomberg Business.
--Photo courtesy of Uber.
Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.