Idaho Governor Opposes Larger Supreme Court

BOISE, ID — Governor Brad Little and 19 other governors issued a joint letter today to President Joe Biden opposing any efforts to increase the number of justices on the U.S. Supreme Court. According to a press release from the governor's office, the governors highlight how any attempt to increase the number of Justices on the court for partisan gain will manipulate the Court's decisions.

Click here to subscribe to our free breaking news alerts delivered to your inbox and mobile devices. You can also download our free Patch mobile app on Android or iPhone.

Little's office states the Supreme Court is essential to the preservation of our democracy and in the absence of understanding from the Biden administration, Governors are stepping up to assume a key role in ensuring that the nation's highest court remains independent and free from political pressure and partisan power grabs.

Signatories to the letter include Governor Lttle and Governors Kay Ivey (AL), Doug Ducey (AZ), Ron DeSantis (FL), Brian Kemp (GA), Kim Reynolds (IA), Eric Holcomb (IN), Tate Reeves (MS), Mike Parson (MO), Greg Gianforte (MT), Pete Ricketts (NE), Chris Sununu (NH), Doug Burgum (ND), Mike DeWine (OH), Kevin Stitt (OK), Henry McMaster (SC), Bill Lee (TN), Greg Abbott (TX), Spencer Cox (UT), and Mark Gordon (WY).

Portions of the letter include:

"As Governors, we oppose any attempt to increase the number of Justices on the Supreme Court of the United States. In short, ‘court packing’—or increasing the number of Justices to manipulate the Court’s decisions—would be unprecedented, unproductive, and unpredictable. The highest court in our land has seated nine justices for more than 150 years and has persisted throughout our nation’s history, dispensing justice even when faced with landmark, controversial decisions.”

"In April, you signed an Executive Order to form the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States to explore reforming the Court, specifically including the consideration of court packing. Opposition to the composition or past decisions of our Court should not be the impetus for radical change to a bedrock branch of our nation’s government.”

“We urge you to withdraw this proposal from consideration. Legal scholars from across the country and on both sides of the political aisle agree that court packing will breed perpetual court packing—it will never be enough. Each partisan shift will result in seats added to the Court until the Court has lost not only its independence but its authority. The end result of court packing would lead to inconsistent rulings that undermine the legitimacy of the Court and fail to guide our nation and serve our states."

Stay connected! Like Boise Patch on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Have a news tip or suggestion on how I can improve Boise Patch? Maybe you're interested in having your business become one of our latest sponsors? Email any and all inquiries to me at john.braese@patch.com.