Community Corner
ICYMI: Should Pit Bulls Be Banned in Ellicott City? Readers Respond
Are pit bulls inherently aggressive, or just misunderstood? We asked Patch readers for their thoughts.
ELLICOTT CITY, MD–A recent attack by a pit bull of its owner in Anne Arundel County has again ignited a debate in Maryland about whether the breed is inherently dangerous.
Be sure to like Ellicott City Patch on Facebook!
On April 4, a pit bull was euthanized by police after it attacked a Churchton woman and would not let go. But the dog’s owner told Patch that he was ill and never aggressive.
Find out what's happening in Ellicott Cityfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
“My dog was not an aggressive animal, he had a medical condition that caused what happened,” Mary Patton said.
She is unequivocally opposed to total bans on dog breeds.
Find out what's happening in Ellicott Cityfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
The incident prompted comment from Tony Solesky, a Towson man whose son was mauled by a pit bull in 2007.
After Solesky’s child was attacked, a Maryland court ruled pit bulls are “inherently dangerous.” The ruling held dog owners and landlords liable for any attacks by pit bulls, prompting landlords statewide to ban the dogs from rental housing.
A 2014 Maryland law supported by the Humane Society overturned the breed-specific ruling, reports The Huffington Post.
We asked Patch Readers in Ellicott City if pit bulls deserved the title of “Most Dangerous Dog in America” and the ban that sometimes comes along with it. Here’s what they had to say:
- "No. They're ridiculous and fueled by fear and ignorance. There should be bans against owners who mistreat these breeds and don't love and train them properly. My aunt rescues bull terriers and they're the sweetest dogs if properly cared for."
- "Pet owners should be held responsible for the actions of their pets, but I also think landlords and property owners should be able to decide one way or another."
- "No, we are a pro dog town."
- "I am so happy to live in Howard County!"
- "No, but pet owners should be held responsible for the actions of their pets."
- "Never"
The ASPCA released a statement stating that they “oppose any state or local law to regulate or ban dogs based on breed.”
They explain that the data collection methods that go into forming dog bite statistics are often unreliable. Specifically, breed identification can be difficult, especially with mixed-breed dogs, which can lead to an inaccurate calculation of a breed’s bite rate. Further complicating matters is the fact that "pit bull" is not an actual breed.
The National Canine Research Council says that responsible pet ownership is the key to aggression prevention, and that it’s the duty of the owner to not allow “a pet to become a threat or a nuisance.”
While the question of “bad breeds” is still up in the air, for every bad pit bull story, there’s a good one to match.
Do you have an opinion on pitties? Share it with us in the comments below or on our Ellicott City Patch Facebook page.
Make sure to check out our national Patch Pets Facebook page for the latest news from the animal kingdom.
>>Photo by Getty Images via Flickr
Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.