Jonas Gerard Evaluates the Process Versus Results-Based Approach

In order to achieve maximum efficiency, people sometimes need to experiment with various approaches to solving issues. For example, individuals who work in fast-paced environments will generally need to be deadline-savvy. Similarly, those who work as independent contractors, per se, will need to hold themselves accountable to a predetermined schedule.

In some scenarios, however, people will find different ways to solve similar issues. This is where the notion of the process-based versus the results-based style comes in. For those unfamiliar, process-oriented operations revolve around prioritizing the process which one may be doing. The results-based approach, on the other hand, boils down to simply looking for maximum outputs with little regards for the inputs. So, what would be the superior way to handle operations for those who may be eligible to use both of these?

Process-Oriented Professionals

In New York, we are no stranger to large scale disasters and catastrophe. Between the winter storms that plague the area, fires, riots, and the attacks on 9/11, New Yorkers have grown accustomed to various forms of disruption. So how do we respond when these events take place? Luckily our government is able to employee a process-oriented approach that mobilizes the general public into action through a focus on a step-by-step methodology. This keeps everyday citizens and volunteers on task and working towards the eventual goal of fixing the problem. Thus, an easy way to comprehend how process-oriented operations function is to focus on scenarios where it may be impossible or an individual worker to see the end result.

Other great examples include countless politicians that frequently run for public offices. Although many of them may be unable to win the elections, they still offer maximum effort. This is due to the fact that they are process-based individuals who believe that making a change is not dependent on final results.

Result-Oriented

Regardless of the fact that being result-oriented can carry some negative connotation, it is a great way to accomplish goals. It allows the individual to overlook the necessary work that is required and simply focus on the final result.

Doing so will help maximize focus and achieve greater efficiency. A famous painter with decades of experience, Jonas Gerard, claims that individuals who use this approach are practically impossible to compete with. Even though Mr. Gerard would fall in the previous category, he sees many benefits to being result-oriented. The most important one pertains to the fact that these professionals will seldom give up on their dreams.

Instead, chasing their ultimate goal will become the main priority until it is achieved. This facilitates longevity and persistence that can help one overcome adversity. Thus, the benefits of being focused on results are just as widespread as the benefits of being process-oriented.

Can one really choose?

In reality, choosing between the process and the results may be an impossible decision. Think about the aforementioned example with New York. Although most individuals were process-oriented volunteers, they certainly carried certain result-based characteristics. Thus, deciding to completely focus on either one of these two may be impossible.

Instead, people should look for the perfect combination of loving the process while looking forward to the result. This is how Jonas Gerard maintains his impressive curriculum when it comes to the constant creation of artwork. It is also how working professionals are able to raise families and build large projects simultaneously.

Also, one must take into consideration the industry in which they work as their options to approaches might be limited. For instance, being a professional athlete will make it very difficult to be results-oriented since victories are not guaranteed. Thus, certain fields will be more prone to one of the two approaches by default.