Business & Tech
Blackjack Players Fold In Lawsuit Against Encore, MGM
Their gamble that cheap table winnings entitled them to higher-stakes payouts did not pay off in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.
EVERETT, MA — The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled against blackjack players who sued Encore Boston Harbor and MGM Springfield casinos for a higher payout after winning at the lower-stakes tables.
The gamblers argued that state gaming regulations were unclear at the time and required casinos to pay players who are dealt a "blackjack" at the odds of 3 to 2, versus 6 to 5. This would entitle winners to $150 on a $100 bet, versus $120 on the lower-stakes tables, according to the court.
But the court found the casinos identified the lower-stakes tables as having a 6 to 5 payout. These tables required lower bets, and the odds were clearly labeled on the felt, according to the court.
Find out what's happening in Maldenfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
Further, the Massachusetts Gaming Commission consistently interpreted its regulations to authorize the 6 to 5 payout option on lower-stakes tables, the court found.
"We conclude that the plaintiffs understood the rules and the stakes, and that deference is due to the commission's interpretation," the decision reads. "Therefore, the plaintiffs lose this last bet."
Find out what's happening in Maldenfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
The commission amended its blackjack regulations in October 2020.
Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.